website statistics

15 Myths About Barefoot Running: What My Experiences Have Taught Me

Posted by on Jan 10, 2012 | 35 Comments

This post is a tangent derived from my post last week about some shoe industry misconceptions and my post a few days ago about the changing nature of our audience.  I’ve been thinking about the various things I’ve learned on my barefoot journey.

When I started, I made a lot of assumptions.  Most of the assumptions were based on the teaching of others or my own apparently logical conclusions.  Most of the assumptions were reinforced by groupthink- our community repeated the beliefs without much critical thought.  If someone objected, they were marginalized and dismissed as having an agenda or other such dismissive rationale.  We had a tendency to espouse the results of other people’s experiences.  When we repeated it, it was nothing more than dogma.

Since that time, I’ve consistently pushed my own barefoot limits.  I’ve never been the kind of person that recognizes a boundary and stays on the side of safety.  It’s my nature to push forward when other people or my own body object.  I don’t shy away from challenges I am clearly not prepared or well-trained to handle.  I willingly accept the lessons learned through failure.  I would never grow if I weren’t willing to leave my comfort zone.

My curiosity has also led me to experiment endlessly.  I’ve probably tried more shoes, minimal… er, barefoot shoes and otherwise, than most.  I’ve tried running barefoot in as many different conditions as possible.  I’ve also been open to discussions with anyone and everyone- runners, non-runners, shoe store owners and employees, shoe industry insiders, etc.

This pushing of the limits has allowed me to learn a great deal about barefoot running- much more than if I always played it safe.  Always questioning everything, even my closely held beliefs, has given me valuable insight to our world.   Over time, I began to realize many of the assumptions I made were either wrong or did not apply to every situation.  In short, I was wrong.

There’s a danger in admitting you were wrong.  If people look up to you as a “leader”, they may see your admission of error as a weakness.  After all, if I were wrong in the past, why should they trust anything I say today?  That was basically my argument against barefoot running coach certification- how many cert programs would change if they got something wrong?  Anyway, I’m willing to take that risk in the name of progress.  We don’t know everything there is to know about barefoot running… why pretend we do?  Let’s admit the gaps in our knowledge and work together to fill said gaps.  Let’s avoid letting our egos stand in the way of progress.  After all, I’d rather create an army of free thinking leaders than a group of conforming followers.

With that, I give you my list of beliefs I once held that I now actively question:

1. Barefoot running is for everyone. If we never introduce raised heel supportive shoes, pretty much anyone, barring circulation or sensory deficits, could run barefoot.  HOWEVER, reality is a little different.  Some people that have spent their lives in supportive shoes have so much foot atrophy, transitioning to barefoot is not worthwhile.  In some cases, it may even be impossible.  This one is a little difficult to admit because the hard-core shoe crowd has been telling us this for a long time.  Admitting they may have been right stings a little.

2. Shoes are evil.  Shoes are sometimes necessary for protection.  That may be protection from the elements, protection from the terrain, or protection from flora or fauna.  We can navigate a great deal of our environment when barefoot.  Interestingly, we’re more capable of navigating areas developed by man than the natural world.  It’s a lot easier walking barefoot down a concrete sidewalk than through the open desert or across a mountain pass.  shoes are tools that allow us to go and do things we can’t do barefoot.

3. Shoe companies are evil and only concerned with profit.  I touched on this in my “misconceptions” post.  The advent of the modern running shoe came about through some misinterpreted research and unexpected customer demand.  There was never any ill will- the companies were producing shoes that solved what they thought were things that caused injuries (pronation, for example.)  They weren’t purposely deceiving the public.  Yes, shoe companies are in the business of selling shoes… that’s why they’re a shoe company.  Just because they have a profit motive doesn’t mean they’re evil.    In fact, that profit motive assures they want runners to stay injury-free.  An injured runner doesn’t buy shoes.  As we see more research supporting minimalism in the years to come, we’ll see companies increasingly using the influence in their designs.

4. Barefoot running is the best way to learn good form.  For most people, the addition of a tactile connection to the ground is an invaluable tool to learn good form.  However, it’s not necessarily a prerequisite to learning good form.  I’ve met too many people that simply cannot learn to run by feel OR are overly distracted by the feeling of the ground.  I credit Jeremy Huffman with hammering this point home… for years it seems.  People can learn good form in a variety of ways- barefoot is just one of many.  I happen to think it’s the fastest and most effective, but not necessarily for everyone.  For some, programs like Pose, ChiRunning, Good Form Running, or Evolution Running may be a better option.

5. There is such thing as good form.
  Well, sort of.  Back in the day I thought there was a definite right way to run and wrong way to run.  Since those “black and white” days, I’ve recognized there’s a lot of gray area.  For most people, there are benefits from learning to run with better form, but what constitutes “better” is debatable.  While I believe using shorter strides and faster cadence with your feet landing under your center of gravity is better than overstriding with a heavy heel strike, there are a lot of people that get away with the latter without problems.

The lesson- humans are infinitely adaptable.  As I’ve discussed with our diets, we can get away with a lot.  If there’s an ideal, we have tremendous latitude to deviate from that ideal.  It may be beneficial to gravitate toward that ideal, but defining the ideal itself is difficult.  The best course of action is probably self-experimentation.  Test out different ideas, continue those that produce positive results, stop those that produce negative results.  I’ll continue teaching toward what I consider to be an ideal, but I will also recognize there’s a lot of variance from that ideal.  I’ll accept those that succeed using a different ideal.

6. You can run anywhere barefoot with enough practice.  I used to believe this… until I actually tried it.  In fact, it’s one of my biggest pet peeves.  It’s usually said by complete newbies or road runners that live in relatively warm climates… never someone that has actually attempted to run on truly difficult trails.  For anyone that has tried pushing their barefoot limits, this notion is laughable.  There’s a reason nobody has been able to complete a 100 miler barefoot.

Barefoot skeptics often say barefoot running may have been adequate for our ancestors, but not in our modern world.  I actually think they have that backwards.  Our modern asphalt and concrete world is FAR more barefoot-friendly than man natural areas.  Back country mountain trails with sharp granite and deserts with fifty species of thorny plants are two barefoot-unfriendly areas that come to mind.

7. You should be allowed to go barefoot anywhere and everywhere.  This is a tough issue for me.  It’s a battle between my belief in personal freedom versus respecting the rights of others. We should be allowed to go barefoot in public, including public buildings.  Private businesses are a gray area.  Business owners should have the right to refuse barefootedness.  However, I’m not above using persuasion to convince private businesses that barefootedness is acceptable.

[Edit- the Primalfoot Alliance asked a good question via Twitter- why should businesses be allowed to discriminate?  My answer- personal freedom.  If a business owner wants to ban barefooters, so be it.  We shouldn’t take that right away from them.  HOWEVER, I also support the right of barefooters to launch a full-scale boycott of that business, which I would readily join said boycott.  It’s like the freedom of speech- we shouldn’t limit it because we don’t like the message… but we also shouldn’t limit the consequences a person faces for exercising that right.  Just my opinion about personal freedoms…]

8. Toe spring is bad.  Toe spring is the upward curvature of the toe box in most shoes.  The conventional barefoot wisdom vilified toe spring.  The curve placed the toes in an unnatural position.  After testing many shoes with toe spring, I concluded it wasn’t something that interfered with running gait… assuming the sole is flexible enough to flatten out.  In fact, shoes without toe spring usually suffer from a serious problem.  The fabric from the top of the toe box folds, which rubs on the top of the toes.  Some degree of toe spring may be a good thing.

9. Cushioning is bad.  Cushioning is a tricky issue.  On one hand, it can make very long runs more comfortable and provide protection on extremely rugged terrain.  On the other hand, it hides bad form and usually increases how hard your foot strikes the ground.  Based on this I rarely if ever, recommend cushioned shoes to people learning good form unless they are learning using a method that does not require tactile sensation (like Pose or Chi… though both of those methods could probably be enhanced by being barefoot.  I digress…)  I would recommend cushioned shoes to people that require the protection… but only if they have developed the ability to maintain good form without tactile feedback.  Christian wrote an entire post about this topic.

10. Arch support is bad.  This is even trickier than cushioning.  Arch support is prevalent in the non-minimal shoe community… even thought of as a requirement.  Arch support is acceptable… if you have an injury.  Arch support immobilizes.  As such, it can be used to immobilize the foot to allow it to heal after an acute injury.  As soon as the tissue has healed, however, arch support should be removed and the area strengthened through rehab.  Once up to full strength, arch support should be avoided.  The problem is arch support is used chronically to treat symptoms that should be fixed via strengthening.

11. Barefoot running reduces injuries.  For many people, barefoot running WILL reduce injuries.  I’m one of those people.  My only significant injury I’ve had over the last six years or so is a broken toe.  Many people experience similar benefits.  However, this is not a universal guarantee.  Some people will experience more injuries when running barefoot.  The change in gait places different stresses on the body, which transfers the injury risk from one area to another.  In VERY general terms, the injuries tend to change from skeletal injuries in the traditionally-shod population to soft tissue injuries in the barefoot population.  Being cautious when transitioning can help reduce the risk significantly, but it will not completely eliminate the risk of injuries.

12. Transition shoes are a bad idea.  I was adamantly against “transition shoes” for a long time.  A transition shoe is a shoe that fits somewhere between a raised heel, motion control shoe and a true minimalist “barefoot” shoe.  The idea is logical- you can “step down” gradually to get from point A to point B.  I have always been an advocate of ditching the shoes altogether and learning good form while barefoot.  Minimalist shoes can be added at a later time once good form is properly learned.

The problem- long-term shod runners usually have very weak feet.  It may take an exceptionally long time to strengthen their anatomy to deal with the rigors of a changed running gait.  This will likely require a significant reduction in training.  In many cases, it means going back to near-zero mileage.  For some, it makes more sense to gradually move to a more minimal shoe without radically changing form.  With each step down, running gait will have to be tweaked.  The overall process of learning good form usually takes longer.  However, it may take less time to get back to their previous mileage because they won’t have to rebuild their base.  Individual situations will warrant the best course of action; it’s nearly impossible to give “one size fits all” advice.

13. Heel striking is bad.  After watching A LOT of runners running in a variety of shod and unshod conditions, reading the science, and talking to the people doing the science, it’s fairly safe to assume how your foot hits the ground isn’t as important as where your foot hits the ground.  This was a major revelation for me as I had been a long-term proponent of a midfoot strike.  Based on emerging data and anecdotal evidence, landing on your heel doesn’t increase ground reaction forces as long as you’re landing under your center of gravity.  In other words, overstriding, or landing with your foot in front of your center of gravity, is the problem.

Part of this revelation came from watching ultrarunners.  When running very long distances, efficiency is the key.  Almost every ultrarunner utilizes a short, quick cadence with their foot landing under their hips.  Most land on their heel, but without the driving force you typically see in shorter distance road runners.  This was such a revelation, it influenced my teaching at the Bareform clinics I conduct.

[Edit: this is a complex issue… I may be wrong about being wrong.  Check out this recently-published study.]

14. It takes a long time to learn good form.  We used to believe it took many months if not years to learn good form.  We obsessed over a million details.  We tweaked this and that.  Over time, our teaching started getting more and more complex.  My move to simplify my life caused some reflection about how we taught barefoot running.  I realized we were making this too difficult.  We were giving people too much to think about.  I changed course and dramatically simplified my teaching to three items- posture, where your foot lands, and cadence.

Using this method, I found most people could learn good form… in about 60 seconds.  It took another four or five minutes to teach some basic self-diagnostic methods to fix problems.  many people could immediately implement these changes and make a dramatic difference in one ten minute session.  It may take some people longer, and it usually takes some time to allow the body to adapt to the changed demands on your body, but the actual learning of good form is pretty simple.

15. Barefoot running will make you faster or be able to run longer.  Barefoot running may make you run faster and longer, but it’s not a guarantee.  Some people never regain their shod pace or endurance when barefoot.  Sometimes they’re okay with the degraded performance because they find running more enjoyable.  If they learn good form and learn to use minimal shoes properly, many people will get faster and be able to run longer.  I have met a few people that did not improve.  Furthermore, the transition to barefoot and minimalism made it impossible for them to go back to their raised heel motion control shoes without having to go through another transition period.  Because of this, making the transition to barefoot and minimalist shoe running can be risky.

There’s a reason so few people win races barefoot, and it has nothing to do with shoe sponsorships.  For the vast majority of the population, shoes improve performance by providing some protection.  this protection gives a greater margin of error, which allows the runner to push a little bit harder.


So what’s left?  There are exceptions to every belief or idea, but there do seem to be some things we probably got right.  For example:

  • Raised heels don’t do anything to help us biomechanically assuming we’ve never worn high heels in the first place,
  • Motion control shoes offer no significant advantage,
  • Pronation isn’t a bad thing,
  • Severe overstriding is a bad thing,
  • We’d be better off if we didn’t put our kids in raised heel shoes.

There are others, but this is a start.

Of course, this is my list.  I put it out there to start discussion.  I don’t expect you to begin quoting me.  In fact, I forbid it.  Test your assumptions with your own experiences.  Make your own list.

There’s a general lack of skepticism surrounding our community, and it does all us a disservice.  We should be more open to opposing viewpoints.  We should also be more open to questioning our own beliefs no matter how logical they may seem, no matter how many people agree with us, or who supports the idea.  We need to seek out opinions outside our small community.  Through this process, we’ll gain a greater understanding of that which we preach.  It will also give us more ideas we can use for self-experimentation which will ultimately improve our running… and by extension, our lives.

Listen more than you talk.  Be open to new ideas.  Consider other possibilities.  Actually try something before speaking out against it.  Don’t automatically agree with “experts”, including me.  Same deal with crowds… just because an idea is popular doesn’t mean it’s right.  Free yourself from your own biases and look at things from other people’s perspective.  Most importantly, be willing to change your stance when confronted with conflicting evidence.

What are your thoughts?  Are there any beliefs you held, but experience proved otherwise?




Be Sociable, Share!
Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

Related Posts:


  1. Barefoot Running University » 15 Myths About Barefoot Running | Jogger Tunes
    January 14, 2012

    […] .nrelate .nr_sponsored{ left:0px !important; } // Barefoot Running University’s post titled 15 Myths About Barefoot Running: What My Experiences Have Taught Me is required reading if you’re interested in barefoot (or “minimalist”) running. […]

  2. Bob (Downtown Runner)
    January 14, 2012


    #1: “Some people…..”
    #2: “Shoes are sometimes……”
    #4: “For most people….”
    #5: “For most people….”
    #7: “I rarely if ever,…..”
    #10: “acceptable…. if you have an injury…”
    #11: “For many people…..”
    #12: “In many cases……” “For some,….”
    #15: “Some people…..” “I have met a few people……”

    I keep re-reading your post here. What strikes me is that in almost every item you seem to admit that for the majority of people the beliefs are actually true. You rightly point out that not everyone is the same and we should not be dogmatic. I agree. But I would still maintain that most people would benefit from following most or all of the “conventional” BFR “beliefs”.

  3. Tracy Longacre
    January 13, 2012

    Great post Jason.

    re: #5 — I think you are right on here. If we could have gone everywhere all the time without shoes, I don’t think we would ever have invented them. But when it’s winter and you’re hungry and that elk goes running up into the forest and you can’t go after it, ya start thinking about what you can put on your feet so you can get ya summa that meat. . .

  4. Paul Wallis
    January 11, 2012

    Overall an excellent post as always Jason. Just two points if I could nit pick a little. First it would seem a lot of your myths about barefoot running center around not making exclusive statements (eg. saying all runners can run barefoot). On this point I would also have to agree. There are always a few people in every population that don’t conform to general rules for a variety of reasons. For example saying that everyone can learn to run barefoot is erroneous. Anyone who has poor circulation in their feet are a prime example of someone who should not be running barefoot.

    Also when it comes to point number #7 I also agree. Permitting barefoot patrons in private buisnesses should be up to the owner of the establishment. However often more than not the reasons for not permitting a barefoot patron usually lies on ignorance of the store owner. They would be more honest if they just simply stated “that’s our preference” rather than use one of the old tired excuses like safety, and infection control which we all know are lame excuses. Also being barefoot should not be enforced in a public area, as they are not privately owned. For example forcing a citizen to wear shoes in a library is very disciminatory, and kicking a patron out could be deemed as harassment. Being barefoot in public should be a right of all people.

  5. Rob Youngren
    January 11, 2012

    You’ve certainly come a long way in your experience and maturity in the sport. Part of this process is actually getting out there and learning for yourself; putting yourself in someone else’s shoes (or feet).

    One area that I should highlight is the unique needs of the long time, long distance runner. The sorts of stresses we put on our bodies, day after day for many years are quite different than what a hobby jogger endures. So I strongly feel we have unique needs. I realize now that I will probably require arch support for the rest of my long running days. I see the value of zero drop shoes, minimal cushioning, toe splay etc… But I’ve learned that my arches at least don’t need to be flexing so much. This constant flexing, and flexing over thousands of miles has created a heel spur in my right foot (now it’s thankfully broken off!). And honestly the best I felt running, overall was when I used to run with arch supports. So now I’m back to that but have picked up on a lot of the rest of minimalist movement and use what works for me.

    At the end of the day that’s what it’s all about: we are all experiments of one.

  6. Mo
    January 11, 2012

    Jason, you nailed it again!
    This reminds me of two of my favorite sayings:

    “Science ends when our desire to believe exceeds our duty to doubt.”

    “The most dangerous thing about mastery is losing the ability to learn from the novice.”

    Your continued skepticism of everything and humorous approach to all subjects keeps me coming back for more. Thanks again for doing what you do!

  7. Dave Robertson
    January 11, 2012

    Once again, a very enjoyable read, with some challenges & softening of views which I think is the way to go in achieving a balanced commentary of barefoot (style) running.

    A number of your points share common ground with the recent writing of Ross Tucker from Cape Town, on The Science of Sport site:

  8. Stefan
    January 11, 2012

    I read this so often on cushioning:

    On one hand, it can make very long runs more comfortable ….. On the other hand …. usually increases how hard your foot strikes the ground

    Doesn’t this contradict itself

  9. EdH
    January 11, 2012

    I personally don’t think 10 is relevant. If you have an injury, then you should be wearing something immobilizing. Anytime I discuss barefoot/minimalist running, I am doing it under the assumption the person I am talking to is fit, healthy and either injury free or trying to figure out why they have some typical running issue (shin splints, plantar fasciitis, etc.) If they have an injury that needs to immobilize their foot, running shouldn’t be on their list of things to do for some time.

    As for the other 14 items, great list. We all tend to be too black and white sometimes. Posts like these lend far more credence to the barefoot movement than do posts from what I’d call ‘barefoot nazis.’

  10. Ramzev
    January 10, 2012

    I think this is a natural progression for many new ideas. At first there is a sharp line in the sand on what is right and wrong, there is a lot of anecdotal evidence to support said idea and these are too often used as fact to convince others.
    But as ideas are exchanged and theories have time to be tested the line gets a bit grey. Right and wrong start to meld into something new all together here maybe we call it, I don’t know, the “Hybrid Runner”?

    On a side note, are you wearing a cup? The backlash could be scary on this one.

    • Jason
      January 10, 2012

      I agree about the progression of ideas.

      Backlash? I thought everyone always agreed with me? 🙂

      My hope is this post (along with the others) will at least get a few people to question some of their assumptions.

      • Ramzev
        January 11, 2012

        Keep going, I’m almost convinced to throw on a pair of Merrell’s.

  11. krista
    January 10, 2012

    We are all varied creatures. What works for some of us, may not work for others. Some of us have weird, funky bits and abnormalities that makes us run differently than others and which may require slightly different form or even training. One thing is for sure… we can only learn what works best for ourselves.

    • Jason
      January 10, 2012

      Agreed, Krista!

  12. briderdt
    January 10, 2012

    The belt on your gi is turning white again. The more we know, the more we realize that there is so much more to know, and that really, we don’t know much at all.

    • Jason
      January 10, 2012

      It’s sort of like college that way. 🙂

  13. Harry
    January 10, 2012

    Hi Jason- very interesting post . I am surprised by points 5 and 13. For me there is such thing as good form – but you dont need to adopt it to be a succesful runner(in what ever definition you have for success). There are always exceptions to the rules but There is good golf swings but some pro’s look like they have a racoon in thier pants when they swing a club – but they knowhow to put the ball where they want. But in terms of bio-mechanics one can make an arguement for good form. Secondly in terms of point 13 I have not seen the evidenece so will not deny that heel striking may not increase groud reaction forces , but surely midfoot/forefoot aides in the absorbtion of said forces somethinh the heel cannot do – so you rely purely on hips and knees whereas midfoot shares that load with ankle as well? Or am I missing something here?
    Anyway once again a fascinating read – thank you

    • Jason
      January 10, 2012

      In regards to five, it’s tricky. The POSE folks would suggest there is such thing as good form, and it’s narrowly defined. The method they use to come up with that ideal is questionable, though. I think there’s an ideal- it’s what I teach. However, there’s enough variability from my ideal that I have to conclude that one ‘ideal” doesn’t exist. There’s just too much individual variability. It’s one of the reasons I like using barefoot running to learn good form- it allows each of us to find our own ideal. Its not perfect, but better than trying to teach one specific universal “ideal.”

      In regards to 13, I was shocked by the data, too. Logically, it seems that our foot should play a huge role in absorbing impact forces, which is negated by landing on the heel. The data suggests otherwise. Anecdotal evidence suggests otherwise, too. There are a lot of shod runners that land on their heel under their center of gravity and experience no problems. That goes for maximally and minimally shod. There are even some barefoot runners that land heel-first under the COG. Keep in mind, this isn’t dramatic like the overstriders… the heel is gently touching a few milliseconds before the rest of the foot.

      I’ve tried using that gait and it fails miserably. I just can’t do it with any degree of smoothness or efficiency. I’m relying entirely on others experiences for #13.

  14. Erik
    January 10, 2012

    Great post, as always. Here’s a few thoughts.

    First, whether you like it or not, you are a leader, because: you’re (1) the only one (that I’m aware of) investigating, and experimenting with, all facets of barefoot/minimalist running, (2) traveling around the county taking the pulse of the trend/movement and documenting it, and (3) maintaining yourself calmly open to all possibilities.

    Second, I totally agree with your boycott idea. Yesterday, after picking up my daughter from day care after a nice barefoot run, we went into a little shop on the way home at her insistence. The person at the cash register asked me to put on some shoes. Luckily I had my Moc3s with me as back-up, even though temps were in the high 40s, so I did. No big deal. I totally agree with you that private businesses have the right to set dress codes, however faulty the assumptions upon which those may be based (the person said it was for my ‘protection’). Barefooters, in turn, have the right not to patronize those businesses.

    Third, I totally agree with you that transitioning can be highly variable. Twenty years ago I ran barefoot as part of my karate training in Japan. No transition necessary, and I assume I was running with the mid-foot strike I find myself using now. This time around, the transition period has been a lot longer, mainly because I started out with an exaggerated forefoot strike before shifting to what is for me a more natural mid-foot strike. Result: stress fracture.

    Finally, based on your ideas and my experiences, I would propose the following the ‘shoes-r-tools’ paradigm: Adding to ‘temps’ and ‘terrain’ as parameters within which shoddedness is justifiable, we can now add ‘training regimes’ and ‘individual biomechanics.’ The default barefoot setting is then: short-to-medium distances on smooth asphalt in moderate temps 3-5 times a week. Call it the ‘Ken Bob’ setting 🙂 . Most people are probably capable of that. Anything top-bottom, left-or-right of that and the shoes-r-tools paradigm kicks in.

    Keep up the great work!

    • Jason
      January 10, 2012

      Erik- thanks. 🙂 My aversion to being a leader has to do with critical thought. I don’t want people to automatically assume I know what I’m talking about regardless of my experience or logical arguments. I want people to think for themselves and reach their own conclusions.

      • Erik
        January 10, 2012

        Ironically, it’s your reasonableness that puts you in the vanguard! Purism stinks; just ask Bob Dylan and Miles Davis.

  15. Jeff Gallup
    January 10, 2012

    While I really enjoy running barefoot, I agree that its not always practical. But, for me, it certainly is the quickest way to remind myself of the best form for pain free enjoyable running, and I carry that over to running in shoes. Running trails in Colorado, in the winter especially, works much better with shoes. After trying different ones, I know that the critical piece for me is the zero drop design.

    Thanks for this great post.. you’ve brought some great insight into the debate!


    • Jason
      January 10, 2012

      Ha! Those trails in CO are the very trails that helped change my mind about being able to run anywhere barefoot! One loop up and down Mount Sanitas in Boulder took over an hour. If that were a race, I’d easily surpass the cutoffs.

  16. John
    January 10, 2012

    Great post, Jason. Thanks!

  17. Michael Baker
    January 10, 2012


    Great post! The more I read and the more I run, the more I find myself thinking that what matters most is what keeps you healthy. For me that’s a more natural running gate with a low drop shoe.

    I do wonder about toe spring. Toe spring stretches (and stresses)the intrinsic muscles in the foot affecting the dorsiflexion of the toes… Perhaps toe spring doesn’t impact running gate, but are there any collateral effects on the foot’s development?

    • Jason
      January 10, 2012

      Michael- Toe spring would be much worse in stiff-soled shoes. If a shoe is flexible, toe spring is irrelevant as the weight of your body will flatten it. If the sole is semi-flexible (i.e.- toe spring remains when standing in the shoe), problems may arise with some.

      • Aaron
        January 11, 2012

        For me toe spring means that the end of my shoe isn’t hanging down when I’m lifting my foot over something while running. I can sense how high my foot needs to go to clear it but that doesn’t include the sole of whatever shoe I’m wearing. If it doesn’t follow the upward lift of my toes or isn’t crafted with some spring, I’ll inevitably eat some dirt.

  18. Stuart Preston
    January 10, 2012

    Great article, Jason, thank you!

    I have been doing some ‘looking into’ the gait analysis (as opposed to doing actual research). I can’t seem to find any science or data to back it up. I’ve asked several shoe stores for info, but it’s all been conjecture, no data.

    As I read your myths, I’m starting to think these gait analysis systems would do better to swing the camera around to the side of the runner and shoot where the foot lands, rather than the pronation.

    My hypothesis at this point is to have those high-end shoes stores use your 60-second method to re-teach runners good (barefooted) form, then shoot the video. I bet their gait improves instantly and the ‘right’ shoes will no longer be required.

    • Jason
      January 10, 2012

      Stuart, you’re right on several points. “Gait analysis”, as it is done in stores, is not supported by any sort of data… never has been. Looking at gait from the side would be infinitely more useful for shod and barefoot runners.

      BTW- I’m doing what I can to educate store owners and employees using our Bareform method… it’s FAR more effective than my long-winded approah I used a few years ago.

      • Stuart Preston
        January 11, 2012

        Thanks for getting the Bareform method into the stores. I think it will really help the non-elite runners like me stay healthy and out on the run.

    • Curb Ivanic
      January 12, 2012

      Stuart, tough to find evidence for gait analysis as it really depends on who’s doing it. In a running shoe store I question the validity as you can’t simply eye-ball gait. You need to video it and play back in slow motion or break down frame by frame to get an accurate view of what’s going on.

      I’m not knocking store staff but how many employees actually have training in functional anatomy, biomechanics, etc. As a coach I do gait analysis and as anyone who does this professionally will tell you, multiple angles are required.

      If you’re looking for an accurate analysis see a local physio or coach who does this. And have them look at your barefoot and shod gait. They’ll also probably do other movement screens and assessments as well.

  19. Wiglaf
    January 10, 2012

    I saw you think English sucks. Is that your general attitude regarding math, too? No matter how I calculate, I can’t come up with the number 15, but, hey, you’re an innovator. Go with it! 🙂

    Incidentally, did you know that those who run barefoot build up humungous calluses that they can drive a needle into and not feel anything?

    • Jason
      January 10, 2012

      Sorry, it was a coding issue in the initial post… problem fixed. 🙂

      • Wiglaf
        January 10, 2012

        You’ve restored my faith in the public school system! 😉

        I was a disciplined heel striker from when I was young and had a major pronation problem. I practiced heel striking so I wouldn’t pronate. I noticed I had a difficult time running fast that way(I mean sub 6 minute/mile pace). Now? It feels like it flows much better. I’ve yet to truly test and see if I’m faster this way. I’m older, too.

  20. Mamarunsbarefoot
    January 10, 2012

    Excellent post!! All of those points are spot on!!!!!!!