website statistics

New Balance MR00 Minimus Zero Road Review

Posted by on Dec 6, 2011 | 10 Comments

The first generation of the Minimus Road sucked.  It felt like the designers spent all their time and innovation on the Minimus Trail, then phoned in the Road design.  It was only marginally better than the Newton Sir Issac I reviewed a few years ago.  They felt bulky and inflexible.

You know when you were a kid and you’d put boxes on your feet and march around the house at Christmas?  That’s a close approximation of the first generation Roads.

Enter the 2012 Minimus Zero Roads.  What a difference a year has made.

This may be the single biggest improvement I’ve ever seen in one generation of shoes.  I get the feeling the design team realized they produced a turd, then redesigned the new Road based on the MT10.  The sole has changed dramatically.  The upper is even more radical.  The shoe is lighter and more flexible.  It’s zero-dropped (heel height is the same as the forefoot height.)   It went from being the red-headed step-child of the minimalist shoe world to being a legitimate contender for one of the best minimalist road running shoes ever.

Here are the details.


The sole is lightweight and flexible.  The New Balance design team collected information to determine the locations that receive the most wear on the soles of the original Roads, then used the data to reinforce high-wear areas with higher density rubber.  It’s the same philosophy used to reduce weight on the Minimus Zero Trails.  The result is a sole that feels like a solid platform without added weight.

As a road shoe,” traction” isn’t as important as it is with a trail shoe.  The sole grips wet asphalt.  That’s about all that’s needed.

The shoe does feel like it has a bit of EVA… maybe 1-2 mm.  It’s on par with the Trails and most Vibrams.  I’d prefer no cushioning at all, but this will breakdown quickly.


When I saw the upper for the first time, I had a “WTF?” moment.  The tongue is actually part of the upper.  The design team was looking for a way to make the shoe more comfortable when worn without socks.  The obvious key is to eliminate as many seams as possible.  To accomplish this, they drew inspiration fro a burrito.

Yep, a burrito.

Sounds like a pretty dumb idea, doesn’t it?  At least I thought so.

As it turns out, this is the most innovative design I’ve seen since the Merrell Omni-fit lacing system.  The design makes this shoe unbelievably comfortable.  The sockless upper would be perfect, except for one issue. [edit- as several have pointed out, this design is not novel.  Several other shoes from different manufacturers have used the design.  Thanks guys!]  😉

When wearing the shoes for the Dallas White Rock Marathon (I managed to maintain my streak of ho-hum finish times), I developed a nasty abrasion on the top medial side of my big toes.  I suspect this was a function of:

A) The weather.  It was exceedingly wet.  And cold.  I thought Dallas was supposed to be warm in the winter, damn it!

B)  The shape of my foot.  The last used for the Minimus line, while good, does not fit my foot especially well.  The last is anatomically shaped, just not like my foot.  This isn’t necessarily a flaw in the shoe.  For many, the last will fit your foot perfectly.  It does reinforce the idea that it’s important to find a shoe that fits YOUR foot.

Aside from that lone issue, the upper is magnificent.  It is FAR better than the interior of the Minimus Zero Trail, which was a bit of a regression from the previous generation.


The shoe is well-ventilated.  The mesh-and-fabric upper allows air to pass easily.  This also allows the shoe to drain well.  I ran through many ankle-deep puddles during the marathon.  The shoe went from “waterlogged” to “damp” in a matter of minutes.  If it weren’t raining, the shoe would probably have completely dried.

When Would You Use This Shoe?

Road running is obvious.  This shoe is definitely at home on the road.  The minimal design gives some degree of abrasion protection without interfering with gait.  I’m not a fan of wearing shoes for road running, but this would be one of my top four choices if I did (Vibram SeeYa, Luna huaraches, and Merrell Road Glove being the other three.)

The shoe doesn’t fare as well on trails.  For non-technical trails, the shoe is adequate.  Comfort alone would make it a decent choice.  However, the sole does not provide much off-road traction or protection from the debris on technical trails.

Originally I thought the shoe would be a good choice for crosstraining, but the shoe doesn’t have quite enough structure.  If you quickly change directions, your foot will move within the shoe.  This creates a slightly unstable experience when doing anything but running forward.  There are better crosstraining shoes out there.


The Minimus Zero Road is the best Minimus shoe developed to date.  The design is exactly what is needed in a good minimal road shoe: lightweight, minimal protection, comfortable fit, zero drop.  The friction on my toes does raise a red flag, but that could be a function of my foot shape.  Reviews from others should confirm the nature of those injuries.

For overall design, I’d like to see New Balance continue with this platform.  This is definitely their best effort.  In fact, this upper would make a GREAT trail shoe if combined with a zero-dropped outsole of the MT110 and a better lacing system.  Hear that, New Balance- this upper is MUCH better than the Zero Trail upper.  😉

These shoes may have earned a place in my collection, but the fit on my foot moves them down to the “B” team for roads.  If these shoes were made from the same last as the Merrell line, they would be perfect.  Likewise, if the Road Gloves were this light, they would be perfect.  Between these two models and the new SeeYas, most people should be able to pick a minimalist road shoe that fits their foot and performs just as a great minimalist shoe should.

Check out Barefoot Angie’s review.


This product was supplied by the manufacturer.


Be Sociable, Share!
Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

Related Posts:


  1. Michael B
    December 11, 2011

    Anyway we could get a picture of your feet, Jason? You’re one of the few main bloggers that has no fit issues of narrow mid-foot with Merrell’s stuff. Curious what your foot looks like.

  2. Minimus zero Road Review )@BarefootRunningUniversity( « Operatic Runner
    December 8, 2011

    […] with photos at Barefoot Running University Share this:TwitterFacebookEmailLike this:LikeBe the first to like this post. Tagged lone peak, […]

  3. Angie Bee
    December 8, 2011

    great review! Interesting to learn that the tongue is not novel. I didn’t know that but love the upper on these more than any other so far. I was thinking, since I haven’t been able to get a hold of the road gloves, that the Vivobarefoot sole with the minimus upper would be awesome!

    Thanks for the shout out 🙂

  4. Josh W
    December 6, 2011

    Do you have overall height (ground to foot) for either of the new NB’s?

  5. kai keliikuli
    December 6, 2011

    Another excellent review. Thanks Jason!

  6. David Henry
    December 6, 2011

    briderdt – I’ve read that the New Balance Zero line will have both 2E and 4E widths, so I’m hoping that will help for me too. I had the same issue with the MR10’s, the 2E version was much better. I tried the 2E version of the MT10 and really couldn’t tell if there was any increase in width or not. I’m hoping the 4E version of the the zero collection will fit well for me. If not, Merrell and Altra will be my best options.

  7. Rob
    December 6, 2011

    I didn’t like the old road minimus either, I think the last is overall too narrow; would like to see it a bit wider, especially toward the heel. Every run in these seemed to aggravate my Achilles; realized that the narrow last was causing a bit more pronation/roll than I’m used too. They were comfortable to run sockless in though, that was nice. I think I’ll stick with the Brooks True Grit and Altra Instinct for the roads though, like the fit so much better.

  8. briderdt
    December 6, 2011

    Sidi and many others have been using that tongue design for years… It’s not so new, but that doesn’t detract from its effectiveness at all. As for the original Minimus Road, I thought the forefoot fit was hideous, until I tried on the 2E width (and I don’t have a wide foot). It alleviated every issue I had with the original. I’ll likely try on the Zero, and I suspect I’ll have the same issues with it as I did the original MR. If they do a wide version, it may just be perfect.

  9. Matt
    December 6, 2011

    Thanks for the review Jason. The tongue looks similar to one used in earlier versions of Nike Frees.

    Have you tried INOV-8 Road-X 155s? Aside from the heel drop difference, how do they compare? I was also disappointed with the first minimus road, but love the 155s when I’m on the road.

  10. The Running Bran
    December 6, 2011

    For the upper, they drew inspiration from a burrito…or the Brooks Green Silence, which have had that same design for a while now 🙂 I run in the Green Silence though and love that aspect of them, since it allows the upper to snug nice and tight to your foot, so the more the merrier sounds good to me!