website statistics

Merrell Trail Glove Review

Posted by on Jan 4, 2011 | 21 Comments

In February, Merrell will launch their line of minimalist shoes.  The Trail Glove is the trail-specific model in the line.  I have been extensively testing two different pairs of Trail Gloves since October.  Over this time, I have run hundreds of miles in one pair and about one hundred in the other.  Based on my testing, the Trail Glove is the first minimalist shoe I’ve tried that could be considered as a replacement for Vibram’s Five Fingers line.

Before I dive into the details, please read my disclaimer here.  In essence, I made a decision to work with Merrell to develop educational materials which should also be released in February.  The decision was based largely on the merits of this shoe.

When I first tried on the Trail Glove, I was underwhelmed.  It has two areas of EVA padding, which immediately felt mild squishiness.  Also, the medial side of the sole touched my arch.  It wasn’t supportive, but the feel was unfamiliar.  The shoe was snug around the medial metatarsal area, much like the New Balance Minimus Trails.  I walked around in them a bit and decided to delay judgment until I did some running.

Within the first few miles of the first run, I knew these shoes were special.  The weirdness of those first few steps disappeared.  On trails, the shoes performed flawlessly.  Over the next three months, I tested these shoes in every conceivable environment.  I ran an PRed a 5k on roads (Alger Heights 5k in Grand Rapids, MI; 19:12), run a 50k in 20° weather (HUFF 50k in Huntington, IN), did a 30 mile training run in terrible snowy trail conditions, and did a 20 mile road run.  Between these runs I’ve had countless shorter runs of varying distances on asphalt, sand, mud, leaf-covered technical tails, gravel, and everything in between.

The conclusion- no shoe has come closer to minimalist perfection.  I’ll go over the technical details shortly, but first I want to share my criteria for a great minimalist shoe.  A great minimalist shoe must have the following qualities:

  • Zero-drop sole- the heel cannot be higher than the forefoot- the sole is a uniform thickness,
  • Wide toe box- this allows the toes to splay,
  • Thin, relatively flexible heel- This is not as critical as it will be determined by the terrain.  The more rugged the terrain, the thicker the heel (more protection),
  • An upper material that does not interfere with foot function,
  • A closure system that allows for a degree of customization of fit,
  • A liner that eliminates the need to wear socks, and
  • Lightweight.

The ultimate standard: can any given shoe be used to run 100 mile ultramarathons?  If a shoe meets most of the criteria above, it can probably be used for 100 milers.  The Trail Glove, to date, is the only shoe I’ve tried that meets all of the above criteria.

Other shoes have come close.  The Minimus Trail is very similar, but suffers from a raised heel and slightly worse traction.  Vibram’s Trek is close, but the separated toes cause a variety of problems.  Terra Plana’s EVO II is also in the ballpark, but the fit and traction isn’t quite as good.

The specific qualities of the shoe are what ultimately separate it from the others.  The entire package is well-designed and uses all the minimalist shoe elements we’ve been calling for over the last few years.  Merrell is the first to really listen, which was a major factor in my decision to help them develop educational materials.


The sole is made by Vibram.  For those familiar with the Five Fingers line, you will immediately recognize the similarity between the Trail Glove and Trek tread.  The sole is nominally thicker than the Trek, which slightly reduces ground feel in favor of greater protection.  The tread provides ample traction in pretty much any trail condition.  The addition of the toe lugs help immensely in slippery conditions like mud or snow.  In extremely muddy conditions, I would probably opt for a more cleat-like shoe such as the Inov-8 X-Talon 190.


The upper serves the purpose of keeping the shoe on your foot without excessively interfering with natural motion.  The tightness around the metatarsal area would be more puzzling had I not already experienced it with the Minimus Trail.  It seems to be illogical as I would expect the tightness to cause problems.  From a functional standpoint, the tightness keeps the foot from moving excessively within the shoe.  As it turns out, this is an important feature.  Instead of the foot floating and sliding within the shoe, the shoe becomes more like an extension of the foot.  The Trail Glove functions exactly like any of the Five Fingers without the separated toes.  The tightness is perfectly isolated; it doesn’t interfere with the foot function in any way.  If the shoe were specifically designed this way, it is pure genius.  If it wasn’t, it’s a damn lucky discovery.


If I were rating the shoe’s liner for sockless comfort, I would give this a 4.5 out of 5.  It is the first shoe I’ve tried that allowed me to go sockless on a regular basis.  All internal seams are covered with a liner,so there are no “rubbing points”.  The liner itself is comfortable.  I would give the liner a 5 if it were not for one solitary issue.  When running the HUFF 50k, I experienced a slight abrasion about the size of a pea on my right foot.  Jesse Scott was also wearing the shoes for the same race and experienced a larger abrasion, which can be seen toward the end of this video.  In fairness, this is not designed to be a winter running shoe and we were running 33 miles (it’s slightly longer than a true 50k… so goes ultarunning) on trails and the temperature never cracked 20°.  In every other run I’ve done, including a 30 miler in more rugged conditions, I have not had a problem.  Still, it was worth mentioning.


In the past, I was anti-lacing.  I preferred the simplicity of Velcro.  At some point, I realized the simplicity of Velcro came at a price; it was nearly impossible to customize the fit.  When running long downhill sections, a loose fit causes too much movement within shoes.  This became apparent with my venerable Vibram KSOs.  It was impossible to make the fit snug without applying pressure across the entire foot.  The result was the development of serious “top of the foot” pain.  With a lacing system, it is possible to apply pressure to very specific areas while leaving other areas more “open”.


For me, this is a tricky issue.  Generally, I hate any cushioning.  It interferes with my ability to assess the ground I’m running on.  I suspect this is unique to barefoot runners.  EVERY other non-barefoot runner I encounter prefers some degree of cushioning.  As I mentioned earlier, the cushioning in this shoe was immediately noticeable.  Even though it is only a few millimeters thick, it was enough annoy me when walking around.  As soon as I hit the tails, my awareness of the padding disappeared.  In essence, it was a non-factor for trail running.  Unfortunately, the same did not hold true for roads.

My first few road running experiences were not great.  The cushioning was readily apparent and distracting.  I was ready to give up on the shoe for road running purposes.  While on a 20 mile road run with Jesse, we talked about the shoe’s performance on roads.  He noted that the shoe seemed to be performing better on roads.  The first instinct was to attribute that to adaptation- we had adjusted to the unfamiliar sensation.  He then proposed something I hadn’t considered- the small pockets of EVA were probably breaking down.  My higher-mileage shoes were approaching 300 miles, a typical point where heavily-cushioned shoes begin to lose their marshmallowiness. The result- they were becoming more like my ideal road running shoes.

When I got home, I tried my newer pair.  Jesse’s hypothesis was right- the newer shoes had a very slight softness that was not present in the older pair.  My conclusion- the cushioning is a non-factor on trails but does seem to interfere with road running, at least for me.  My problem with road running is easily solved by simply breaking the shoes in.  After about 200 miles or so, they become great road shoes.  In the future, it would be great if Merrell decided to produce multiple variations- one with the current EVA; and one without.  This would eliminate that break-in period, at least for picky barefoot runners like myself.

Toe Box

The Trail Glove is one of the few shoes that utilize a wide toe box.  This is important because it allows your toes to spread out, or splay.  Apparently this triggers a muscular reflex that helps coordinate muscle contractions, which leads to more efficiency when using a midfoot gait.  My PT friends can do a much better job explaining this phenomenon.  As far as I know, there isn’t much research on this yet, but my anecdotal evidence is irrefutable.  A cramped toe box makes a shoe unusable.  The Trail Glove’s toe box is wide and tall enough to allow for ample toe splay.


Admittedly, I think this shoe is somewhat plain aesthetically.  After years of running barefoot or in Vibrams, I’m not accustomed to my feet drawing so little attention.  I suppose this is good for the vast majority of runners that would prefer to not draw undue attention.  Most people would jump at the chance to find a “normal” looking minimalist shoe.  Still, I would like to see at least one crazy color combination in future generations of this shoe.


The sole is made by Vibram.  For anyone familiar with the soles of their Five Fingers line, they last a very, very long time.  It is not uncommon to hear stories of runners getting 1,500-2,000 miles off a single pair before the sole wears through.  With Five Fingers, the upper is much more likely to fail before the sole fails.  Luckily, Merrell apparently has a sterling reputation for quality products.  I was unaware of this until I started doing research before agreeing to help with their educational materials.  When talking to some fans of their products, I was shocked to hear stories of people using their hiking boots for years.  They were almost fanatical about their praise for Merrell’s products.  It seems as if that quality has carried over to these shoes.  After over 300 miles, the shoes have absolutely no signs of wear.  I would not be surprised to see this shoe last for thousands of miles.  I have to admit, Merrell’s apparent philosophy on planned-obsolescence would make me think twice about buying stock in the company.   I now understand the die-hard fans I encountered when doing research.

Trail Performance

The trail performance of the shoe is first-rate.  It provides enough protection for the most technical trails we have in Michigan, while still allowing enough ground feel and proprioception to prevent injury.  The tread works well in a large range of terrain from hard-packed dirt to sand.  The tread works well for both uphills and downhills.  The tread pattern does not gum up in mud.  The light weight and flexibility make the shoe minimally fatiguing.  For trail running, I am hard-pressed to find a single negative  characteristic of this shoe.

Since this shoe has worked so well in testing, I decided to use it as my primary shoe for the Western States 100 Mile Endurance Run in June.  This race has been a long-standing goal of mine; it easily eclipses every other race I’ve run.  This is the shoe I’m trusting to get me through the race.

Road Performance

When the shoes were brand new, I did not especially like these shoes for road use.  As I mentioned earlier, the breaking down of the EVA made the shoes better.  At this point, my 300-mile version would probably be my preferred road shoe in wet or snowy weather.  If I had to wear shoes and weather was not an issue, I think I would still prefer Barefoot Ted’s Luna sandals.

Snow and Mud

I was slightly surprised at the shoe’s performance in both snow and mud.  The tread doesn’t appear to be especially aggressive, but works well.  Before winter, I did a five or six mile run over very muddy trails without issues.  Since winter has hit, I’ve done multiple runs ranging from 3 to 33 miles.  Slipping on snowy, icy trails was not an issue.  I think form and balance plays a role, but the shoes are among the best I’ve tried.

I should note- this shoe is NOT designed as a winter running shoe.  It is not lined or waterproof.  After about five or six miles, the shoes would be quite wet from snow entering the shoe around my ankles, then melting from the heat of my foot.  My feet did not get cold as long as I continued moving, but I experience the same effect when running barefoot in snow.


I am hard-pressed to make a list of negatives attributes for this shoe.  Aesthetically it is a little plain.  I wasn’t thrilled with the EVA padding for road running during the first 100 miles or so.  These complaints are VERY minor, however.  Probably my most significant complaint has to do with a problem most minimalist runners are all too familiar with- the dreaded Vibram stink.  Almost everyone I know that has owned a pair of Five Fingers knows the smell.  The Minimus Trails, which also utilize a Vibram sole, developed the same smell.  The Trail Gloves are no different.

Message to Merrell’s Design Team

I enjoy giving shoe manufacturers feedback.  I am glad more and more are asking for our opinions.  If I were to deliver a single message to Merrell’s design team, it would be simple- DO NOT CHANGE THIS SHOE! The functional characteristics of this shoe are as close to perfect as a shoe can probably get.  I can live with the not-too-exciting appearance.  If I received word Merrell were planning on changing any aspect of this shoe, I would immediately buy 10 pairs.  That would likely carry me through my prime running years. 🙂

In the future, I would like to see a cleated version of this shoe for very muddy trail running.  I would also love to see Merrell produce a line of business or business/casual shoes using the same design characteristics of the Trail Glove.  As long as they don’t mess with the basic features, they won’t go wrong.


The trail glove is the best true minimalist trail shoe I have ever tested.  If there is a shoe that will become the “toeless” Five Fingers, this is it.  I commend Merrell for making a great shoe, and especially congratulate them for having the courage to make a zero-drop shoe.  I believe this shoe is a game-changer for the rest of the shoe industry.  It is direct evidence that the voices of barefoot runners are finally being heard.  Merrell hit a home run with this shoe, and I would expect the other manufacturers to use this as a gold standard to emulate.

I get a lot of people asking me for a shoe recommendation.  This is difficult because we’re all different.  What works for me may not work for all.  Having said that, some shoes have characteristics that make them more desirable than others from a minimalist perspective.  Specifically, some characteristics are ideal for most barefoot runners.  When you need to use shoes due to difficult terrain, weather, speed, or distances, the proper shoe can be a wonderfully useful tool.  Based on my experiences as a shoe reviewer, some shoes are definitely better than others.  Over the years, the shoe choices for barefoot runners have been exceedingly limited.  At this time last year, I did most of my running barefoot because the other shoe choices required too many compromises.  I could get protection from the weather, but no traction.  I could get traction, but the shoe design interfered with my gait.  Every option was inadequate at best.

This year, there are finally options.  Real options.  GOOD options.  In my opinion, the best of the best is a VERY shot list.  For me, the Merrell Trail Glove is undoubtedly at the top of that list.  I expect many others will agree.  It’s not the only option- the Minimus Trails, EVO II, Ted’s Lunas, and Treks are the other shoes I’d list as the “good” options.  Due to my involvement with Merrell’s education program, I am going to resist simply recommending this shoe above all others.  Instead, I urge runners to go to a store and check out all the options.  Read other reviews.  Make your own decisions.  Above all, enjoy the process!

Pictures: All pictures appearing in this post show the shoe after about 300-350 miles of wear.

EDIT- release date confirmed for February 1st!

Be Sociable, Share!
Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

Related Posts:


  1. BobC
    January 11, 2011

    How light is “lightweight”? Some hard numbers would be welcome. The Merrell site claims a per-shoe weight of 6.2 ozs / 175.8 gm. Is this value accurate for the shoes as-tested? For example, does it include the weight of an insole? I’m having a hard time believing this shoe is actually lighter than my racing flats!

  2. Dan Fairbanks
    January 11, 2011

    Thanks Jason for a great review of a shoe I am personally looking forward to. I would like to mention that Born to Run – The Barefoot Shoe Store is the only store that sells or will be selling all of the top shoes that Jason mentions in his article. Please check us out at, or if you are in the NW come to our store in Bellevue, Washington to try on all of Jason’s top minimalist shoes and more.

  3. Barefoot Josh
    January 8, 2011

    Thinnmann: I run on App trails (well, piedmont; I know the trail conditions you’re talking about) in shoes with less cushioning than the Merrells. If you know how to run gently, the sole smooths the rough spots out thoroughly.

  4. StephenB
    January 7, 2011

    Thanks for the timely review. I’m looking for a trail shoe for my first 50 miler (the Ice Age Trail 50 in May).

  5. Merrell Barefoot Running Shoes – Review Posted by Jason Robillard | Road Runner Shoes
    January 7, 2011

    […] it will give me some time to put some miles on them. In the meantime, I’d like to refer you to a glowing review of the Merrell Trail Glove posted over at the Barefoot Running University by Jason Robillard. Jason is working with Merrell to […]

  6. Surfing Vol
    January 7, 2011

    Does the shoe fit true-to-size or did you go up a 1/2 or whole size?

  7. Barefoot running, shoes and techniques | My Four Hour Body
    January 7, 2011

    […] The Merrel shoes are coming out in February. Here is a link to the Merrell site And a great review here […]

  8. Megyn Lansing
    January 6, 2011

    Do you know if there will be a women’s version released in February as well?
    Thanks so much for the review. I have been looking for a good barefoot trail shoe with good traction for mud.

  9. Barefoot Running University » How Wide Is The Toe Box Of…
    January 6, 2011

    […] I posted my review of Merrell’s Trail Glove, I was inundated with questions.  The most common- how wide are the shoes?  Since a simple […]

  10. betsig250
    January 6, 2011

    The Trail Glove is the first Merrell “running” shoe that fits me in 12. I am usually a 12.5 with running shoes but at least for me they are a true size.

  11. Kyle Kranz
    January 6, 2011

    Is that “vibram stink” perhaps from running in them without socks?

  12. Adam Sullivan
    January 6, 2011

    Great review, I can’t wait for them to come out. Just a quick question. What size are you wearing for the Trail Glove and Minimus shoes? I wonder because I generally size one up for my trail runners. All my MT100’s and 101’s have been a 13 and I wonder if this is still good practice with such a wide toe box?

    I have also read plenty of stories about people’s feet actually growing with more and more use of minimalist shoes or going barefoot so maybe the larger size is a better idea anyways.

    Thanks for the insight-

  13. Eric
    January 5, 2011

    I saw that too Chris! I used to wear a 12.5 in running shoes so I wonder if the 13’s would work for me? Hate to spend $120 (includes shipping) to find out they don’t fit right.

  14. Chris Szumigala
    January 5, 2011

    Curiously it appears you can actually ORDER the True Glove in red/black only size 9.5 or 13 NOW???

  15. Margot
    January 5, 2011

    Yay! I have been waiting for your review and it came just in time – I need some shoes. Glad to read about the toe box, an issue for me in any shoe. Thanks for straight, thorough review. I’m going to give them a go… when they are back in stock. 🙂

  16. Sabrina
    January 5, 2011

    Thank you for the fantastic review! I’m in MN and struggling to get my Flows to fit (SO tight in the toes and toes get too cold as well) so I’m in Frees. However, I want to stay as close as possible to VFFs so that I do not have to re-transition. DEFINITELY getting myself a pair of these based on your review!

  17. Charlie
    January 4, 2011

    You mention in your post
    “I would also love to see Merrell produce a line of business or business/casual shoes using the same design characteristics of the Trail Glove. As long as they don’t mess with the basic features, they won’t go wrong.”

    Isn’t the Men’s tough glove that is coming out at the same time exactly what you are talking about?

    Here is a link

  18. Chris
    January 4, 2011

    Great review. If these are actually available on Feb 1, they are my next shoe! If not, the Altra Adam might sneak in there. Is the sizing the same as other shoes?

  19. thinnmann
    January 4, 2011

    I have about 100 miles on my Merrell Trail Gloves. You have done a great review and I totally agree with everything you have said. I might be able to add something that you may have not been able to test directly. You said you have tried them on the most difficult technical trails you have in Michigan. I am not sure that the trails in Michigan are as rocky as Appalachian Mountain trials. Our northeastern mountain trails often pass though areas of rock scree produced by those glaciers so long ago. The rocks are closely spaced and about the size of your ankle. It is sometimes difficult to decide where to put your foot: on the rocks or between them. This type of terrain can easily produce an “ouch” in the midfoot of the shoe. It will be a hard decision to attempt the Escarpment Trail Run this summer in this shoe, for example. I am hoping Merrell designs an alternate pair for northeast trails with a sole more similar to the Inov8 claw shoes. I could do without that heavy rubber under the toes and more texture under the ball of my foot on rocky trails.

  20. Amanda
    January 4, 2011

    So glad to hear the review! I was waiting for it before I decided whether or not to go ahead and got the Inov8’s now I know I’m waiting until February!

  21. Barefoot Josh
    January 4, 2011

    Good timing – I just got mine and Iris hers in the mail today. I tried them on and had the exact same concerns you did. She said she tried them in our tiny woods, and felt like a wood nymph.